It is also a fact that advertising revenue also guarantees journalists' salaries and thus good journalism. this, but it is not wrong. We can only really hope that "Project R" works. As a possible alternative. Until then, all of us other "normal mortals" must - or may - continue to live from advertising. But that does not have to be a bad thing.
Some standard answers that I have france rcs data encountered in 25 years of journalistic work: "I'm not the right person for that, I've only been dealing with the topic for 30 years." - "That sounds interesting, but the timing isn't ideal, I'm very busy at the moment, six months would be better." - "Fine, I can do that, but first I want to know who else is being interviewed and what they say." - "Okay, but no picture please!" The highlight was a small survey on the sidelines of a business event. It was only about short statements, but a lady who was approached said in all seriousness: "Why don't you take my husband, he's standing over there at the buffet."
We regularly receive feedback from women complaining about a male-dominated magazine. If we offer them the opportunity to remedy the problem themselves by doing an interview, they say "That's nice, but..." See above. If women made our lives easier, we would get the quota.