Does this mean that the topic is dead and irrelevant? Not at all. On February 5, a business editor from TX came up with the catchy title: "This is why Thiam will stay in power." Well, at least that was the case at 6:38 a.m. But digital truths have the advantage that they can be changed quickly and seemingly without a trace.
The headline from 10.40 a.m. is: "Thiam japan rcs data falls too late - or not at all." Now one could assume that the business editors of the TX Group can hear the grass growing, constantly keep an ear to the news ticker, immediately take down every small change in the news situation and adapt and update it accordingly.
That would be a possible explanation. But it is probably too simplistic, because the article under the significantly changed title remains exactly the same. introduce a new journalistic dialectic. Surely one can still explain with the same text why Thiam remains in power. But this competent analysis and forecast can also be interpreted as meaning that Thiam will fall too late or not at all. Why commit yourself to it.