The main risks associated with the implementation of software bots

[rakhirhif8963]

“Like humans, RPA bots use privileged access to perform their tasks. This includes moving data between systems from one process to another, as well as connecting to ERP, CRM, or other platforms,” Roy said. Many security risks are thought to arise from human carelessness — and this is true, given the number of successful phishing campaigns — but that doesn’t mean handing off a task to a software bot will magically prevent human error. The fact is that humans are still deploying and managing the bot.

According to Chris Huff, chief strategy officer at Kofax, most RPA security issues can be viewed through two lenses: one that looks at compliance risk and one that looks at operational risk. “Compliance risks typically stem from poor RPA governance, which is caused by poor implementation practices that do not take into account good software azerbaijan mobile database practices that address network security, data privacy, and enterprise architecture,” he says. “Operational risks include the potential for regulatory restrictions and day-to-day controls that support scalability and business continuity.”

One of the main advantages of RPA is that modern tools offer so-called no-code or low-code implementation models. On the one hand, an enterprise can write RPA bots from scratch, but on the other hand, there are many commercial and open source tools that will minimize development efforts. Many of these tools have drag-and-drop interfaces or turnkey options. They are aimed at attracting users who do not have technical knowledge - finance specialists or HR managers. As a result, a team or department of almost any organization can set up and launch a bot, even without the help of IT, moreover, the IT department may not know that they are doing it.