The benefit for the user
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:08 am
This helps to strengthen the reader's confidence in the accuracy of the information. Content depth : Expert review should not be superficial. Every medical statement or advice should be accurate, detailed, thorough and – as already mentioned – based on scientific foundations. It is no coincidence that experimental medical practices are not allowed on landing pages or in Google Ads ads on medical topics (this aspect would be debatable, since I find it wrong that Google arrogates to itself the right to decide what is experimental and what is not in the medical field).
Feedback/Comment Collection : Providing readers cameroon number data with a comment area or forum or similar to provide feedback or ask questions can be beneficial. This allows users to report errors or express concerns. After Google’s 2018 “Medic Update,” many health sites had to rework all of their web content to ensure greater expertise, authority, and trustworthiness. Going a step further: Thinking like a Google Quality Rater However, “just” EEAT is not enough: in the case of consultancy for YMYL sites, it can be a winning idea to dedicate a significant part of the work to aqualitative review of the site, comparing your site and its contents with Google's “ Search Quality Rater Guidelines ”.
Let us remember that Google Quality Raters – real Google employees who have the task of qualitatively evaluating web pages – do not directly influence the ranking with their judgments, but their yardstick is used to set and update the search engine's algorithms. This review process is essentially a further detailed check to evaluate the website from the point of view of a Quality Rater, putting yourself in his shoes. What does a Quality Rater see and how does he judge such web pages? It will be a matter of analyzing a multitude of factors : experience, competence, authority, reliability, quality of content (the EEAT factors), but also general reputation, design, user experience, precise match between content and users' search intent, user interaction with the site itself.
Feedback/Comment Collection : Providing readers cameroon number data with a comment area or forum or similar to provide feedback or ask questions can be beneficial. This allows users to report errors or express concerns. After Google’s 2018 “Medic Update,” many health sites had to rework all of their web content to ensure greater expertise, authority, and trustworthiness. Going a step further: Thinking like a Google Quality Rater However, “just” EEAT is not enough: in the case of consultancy for YMYL sites, it can be a winning idea to dedicate a significant part of the work to aqualitative review of the site, comparing your site and its contents with Google's “ Search Quality Rater Guidelines ”.
Let us remember that Google Quality Raters – real Google employees who have the task of qualitatively evaluating web pages – do not directly influence the ranking with their judgments, but their yardstick is used to set and update the search engine's algorithms. This review process is essentially a further detailed check to evaluate the website from the point of view of a Quality Rater, putting yourself in his shoes. What does a Quality Rater see and how does he judge such web pages? It will be a matter of analyzing a multitude of factors : experience, competence, authority, reliability, quality of content (the EEAT factors), but also general reputation, design, user experience, precise match between content and users' search intent, user interaction with the site itself.