As part of his research, he accused me of my talk show not being successful. I then presented him with the facts in writing. After some back and forth, a disappointed Benini capitulated with the following words: "Okay, okay, a little longer with the flop story." When "Schawinski" became one of the most discussed shows on SF, he actually waited to criticize it. But then, as part of a broadside against SF and Ruedi Matter, he also chopped up my show.
This time he was more subtle: he didn't do any research so that the story he wanted wouldn't be spoiled by facts a second time. His analysis was riddled with errors, which I can't even south korea rcs data list all of. Here is just a small selection: I should decide everything on my own and I can't be controlled (each of my guests is agreed with the editor-in-chief), the market shares are low except in one show (provably false), so far I haven't been able to bring in any top shots from business and politics (four party presidents, Christoph Blocher, Karin Keller-Suter, etc.)
The very first guest was also NZZ board chairman Konrad Hummler - Benini's top boss, but not a top shot for him. I then offered Benini a discussion on "Doppelpunkt" on Radio 1, which he vehemently refused. He was a writing journalist, he said. When I pointed out that today we are in an interactive,multimedia world, he replied that a concert critic would not face criticism either. When I mentioned that a concert critic spreads a personal opinion, while a media journalist has to take facts into account above all else, he backed off. And in doing so, he made it clear what kind of journalism he practices. His method differs from that of Weltwoche in only one respect: there, they face even the harshest criticism during campaigns. Sniper Benini, on the other hand, is, to use his terminology, a flop shot.