When employees return to the office, if employers begin collecting and processing data to ensure both safety and productivity, there is risk associated with what data is collected and how it is used. In this way, organizations can protect employees while managing the risk of privacy breaches.
The higher the risk, the more important it is to justify that the solution chosen is truly balanced and proportionate to the risk we are assessing. Below are six principles to guide the collection of employee data.
Targeted processing
If you decide to collect data, make sure it is done for a specific purpose. For example, you may decide that you need to store daily employee temperature readings to track trends and identify anomalies.
You may have a reason to keep historical data, but for how long? If it is only used to track sudden changes, the past month's data is useless and should be deleted. Likewise, once temperature measurements are no longer required or recommended, there is no reason to keep the measurements.
Once the data has served its purpose, the reason for collecting and storing it disappears.
The usual practice is that when data no longer has any value to the organization and the regulator does not require it to be stored, a decision is made to minimize the risk that the data poses to the privacy of users.
“doing the right thing” in the interests of the data subject, regulations like the GDPR impose huge fines for doing so. As a result, what’s good for the privacy of individuals is also good for the company.
When evaluating your data to better validate what chile whatsapp data and what goes, consider the actual value the data brings to the organization (actual, not potential) and the financial risks it carries.
Proportionality
By default, use the least invasive measures that achieve your goals. If a measure becomes disproportionate to the risk or if the goal can be achieved in another way, abandon it.
The safest way to control the spread of coronavirus in the workplace is to test employees' blood daily. However, it is also the most expensive and most invasive method. It is likely to cause a negative reaction from employees, who should have the right to choose. Insufficiently broad coverage of personnel will lead to a sharp decrease in the effectiveness of this method. It should also be remembered that blood samples contain DNA, the most sensitive information about a person, the collection of which by the employer is completely unnecessary.
While privacy concerns often encourage
-
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:15 am