This also suggests that, potentially, links from sites and pages who have themselves earned diverse link profiles

[zihadhasan012]

Search engines likely use scores about the "authority" of a domain in counting links, and thus, despite the fuzzy language, it's worth mentioning as a data point. The domains you earn links from are, potentially, just as important (or possibly more important) than the individual metrics of the page passing the link. #6 - Diversity of Sources In our analysis of correlation data, no single metric has a more positive a correlation with high rankings than the number of linking root domains.


This appears to be both a very hard metric to manipulate for spam (particularly if you need domains of high repute with diverse link profiles of their own) and a metric that indicates true, broad popularity and imp saudi arabia mobile phone numbers database ortance. You can see a list of top pages and top domains on the web ordered by the number of unique root domains with links to them via Linkscape's Top 500. Although correlation is not causation, the experience of many SEOs along with empirical data suggests that a diversity of domains linking to your site/page has a strong positive effect on rankings.


By this logic, it follows that earning a link from a site that's already linked to you in the past is not as valuable as getting a link from an entirely unique domain. may be more trusted and more valuable than those from low diversity sources. #7 - Uniqueness of Source + Target The engines have a number of ways to judge and predict ownership and relationships between websites.