All four speakers – Gujer, Schildknecht, Blocher and Villiger – delivered extraordinary oratorical performances, each of which reflected their very different personalities.
What are the criteria for such a judgment? All four speakers conveyed a substantive message that they had developed themselves and that they wanted to bring to the public - without any ifs and buts; suspected poland rcs data that they had developed their speeches in processes over a long period of time; All four paid attention to their own linguistic identity; the will to struggle for their own, personal formulations was noticeable; Three of the four speakers did not use slides or images - all four trusted in the power and fascination of their formulations, their reports, descriptions, experiences and their arguments.
Eric Gujer also surprised his listeners (and later the NZZ readers) with a special ability: he, of all people, who has a reputation for being an ice-cold intellectual, defended the framework agreement with the EU not only with argumentative rigor, but also with humor and irony. Roger Köppel will have to measure himself against him 163 times. We live in an era of speeches. Let us be happy.
If you believe in the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Mother Holle, the Yeti and aliens who live among us undetected, you can believe that. If not, you should think twice about whether every tax evader is really a sinner. Whether everyone accounts at home does so solely for base motives. And while you're thinking about it, you could also think about how sinful parking, fashion, environmental and climate sinners really are. And who decides what are sins and who are sinners and based on which criteria. In this respect, not unlike the torturers of the Holy Inquisition.