The SRG is therefore not "better" at converting revenue into jobs than is assumed in the adventurous model calculation for the rest of the economy. That leaves the savings rate: currently, the Billag fees form part of consumer spending, i.e. that part of income that is consumed and not saved. What would the average population do if they had the 400 francs to spend themselves? we don't know. The dishonest answer is: they would consume it (80 percent) and save it (20 percent) in exactly australia rcs data the same proportion as the rest of their income. But that's not the point. Contrary to what the "fact check" would have us believe, new jobs are also created through saving, because saved income is either invested indirectly via the financial system or directly in productive companies.
Because the "fact check" promises to also examine the statements of the initiative's opponents, SP National Councillor Edith Graf-Litscher now says: "A program à la carte is more expensive than the existing offer. Teleclub's basic offer, for example, costs just under 480 francs per year."
You can already guess: 100 percent truth content! Applause for Edith Graf-Litscher! "If you compare the various TV program providers in Switzerland, you will see that the SRG, with its seven TV channels, offers a wide range of content from the areas of information, sport, culture and entertainment at a comparatively low price." That was it. Pure allegations instead of arguments.