The "new NZZ" means that there is a lot more space to fill in the paper. There are at least five commentaries every day, and it is often noted with displeasure that analyses or opinions, which until recently were sufficient for 60 lines, (have to) expand to a whole page with the addition of a huge picture that was unthinkable in the previous NZZ.
Previously, one was exposed to the hustle and myanmar rcs data bustle of the Frankfurt trade fair for three days and then summarised what one had observed in an article that appeared on the Monday after the fair. But now, in accordance with the new newspaper philosophy, the NZZ reporter from Frankfurt has to deliver an article and, if possible, a commentary every day. The first quote from Roman Bucheli about the Bärfuss article comes from one of his daily overview articles, where the scandal is brought into discussion in a few words, perhaps after a rather cursory reading under the pressure of the trade fair.
Nevertheless, if read carefully, the statement does not contradict the findings expressed in the Saturday commentary so clearly that a change of opinion could be inferred from it (see persoenlich.com) . For this commentary, Bucheli studied the Bärfuss article very carefully and came to conclusions which, even if one has a slightly different opinion, certainly meet the standard expected in a public debate, but leave the reading public enough room to make their own judgment.