Since time immemorial, reports on new car models or "travel reports" have not followed the journalistic approach of being a critical portrayal paid for from the editorial budget. As the height of transparency, it is only occasionally bashfully pointed out that this test drive, this trip to this holiday resort, was made possible with the kind support of car brand XY or tour operator YZ.
Things get really wild when a "content poland rcs data provider" makes new value chains profitable by earning money from events hosted by stars and starlets, which it simultaneously celebrates in its publications - in all journalistic independence, of course.
But it doesn't stop there. to say something critical about financial service providers often sees the amount of brainpower that goes into inventing a reason why this well-written and convincingly researched article is unfortunately not suitable for publication. I could name names and examples, but I don't want to burn down my last platforms myself.