Gorgeous photos with great descriptive text that really takes in the detail

[zihadhasan012]

- I'm not sure I'd ever even need that much knowledge about a hotel, but I can imagine it's a picky honeymooner's best friend. Internal link structure looks solid, and it appears Google's already grabbed tens of thousands of pages - site:oyster.com Titles are great - hotel name + geography | Oyster Hotel Reviews. It gets all the relevant keywords in nicely without looking spammy.


Good breadcrumb navigation that helps with any pote bahrain mobile phone numbers database ntial keyword cannibalization (and is helpful for users) Excellent internal linking in content (whenever another hotel/region is referenced, Oyster links to it in context) Ranking #80 for "Hotel Reviews" and rising fast mart, descriptive meta descriptions Good link profile, primarily from press and blog coverage Not afraid to link out to external sites in review (and no nofollows on editorial outbounds, either) Great architecture means that the right pages rank first for the desired query.


For example, even though there are lots of pages about "Fisher Island" in Miami, the destination guide ranks first (fisher island site:oyster.com). The Bad: Exact match domains are so powerful in the rankings, I'm a bit surprised they went with "Oyster.com." That said, there's never been a truly big success in technology that had an associative name - Microsoft, Sun, Oracle, Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Maybe YouTube would be the closest to a billion+ exit that actually had a somewhat descriptive name.