The great myth of penalizing duplicate content

[shaownhasane]

In this case, competition between the two contents does afghanistan phone data not arise and, Splitt continues, it does not arise even if you work in the opposite direction , that is, if you decide to re-propose some posts on your blog in the form of YouTube videos.

Creating only videos, perhaps just varying their length to adapt to the audience on the various platforms, is a new trend that helps you find your own voice and space. But not everyone, even in the era we live in now, likes to consume content only in the form of videos . There are those who appreciate being able to read and examine a text at their own pace.

Also because, if we take for example the contents that help to understand how things work or the tutorials, sometimes it is convenient to have a video other times it is easier to have a text in which you can search for keywords.

The last point to consider, and which is again underlined by Splitt, is the fact that various forms of content can also reach segments of the public belonging to the category of users with disabilities.

Visually impaired people with a YouTube video available, where text is being narrated, can experience that content firsthand from its creator, while those with hearing impairments may find it easier to read text rather than trying to follow subtitles.

The issue of duplicate content has come up several times over the past few years, probably because there is a small misunderstanding about what the policy is regarding the penalization of duplicate content. In this regard, we are re-proposing an old post found on the Google Search Central blog: it dates back to 2008 and Susan Moskwa, master trend analyst, tries to clarify when the penalties are triggered.


It's been 15 years and we're still wondering how the penalties for content published on sites work. Yet, looking at the answer written by Moskwa in 2008 it would seem quite easy to understand what duplicate content is and the possible penalty by Google. There is no penalty for published content, we read at the beginning.