If we have sorted out the primary interpretation a little above

[md.a.z.i.z.ulha.kim4]

Apparently, this is also an important aspect for the survival of the entire human species. "Likes" are about aesthetics. Artistic things also cause a physiological response Now this is a surprise. The study by Lauren E. Sherman and colleagues that we focus on in this article was actually designed to prove or disprove the idea that the brain's response to "likes" and to one's own "like" button presses is rewarding for prosocial behavior and for learning to "be social.


It proved this idea. However, along the way, the scientists found out that the subjects' reward system was more active when they saw artistic images. For some reason, they seemed more attractive to the participants italy business email list of the experiment. This aspect has not been studied much yet. It is too early to draw any significant conclusions, but let us simply note that something aesthetically beautiful on social networks also triggers a “reinforcement scheme” in users. And this fact should not be brushed aside.


How to fit all this into a marketer’s head In essence, in the form of “likes” under the content we have a metric that is quite difficult to interpret and adapt in a practical sense. then we also need a secondary one – practical and understandable. Let's try to divide the information we've received into two groups: 1. - "what content authors get when they see likes under it", and 2.